|
Judy Bachmann is Vice Chair of Citizens Equal Rights Alliance.
The
following came in an e-mail from Susan Puretz, based on some
correspondence with Judy Bachmann. The beginning of this seems to
be taken from Susan's notes of Judy's presentation at the CAGNY
meeting, and at some point Judy is speaking to us directly. I am
not entirely sure which words are Susan's notes and which are Judy's
direct comments, but with that caveat ...
JUDY BACHMANN
Judy
gave a summary of some litigation as regards
the lawsuits
involving lands owned by the Oneida Indian Nation (a corporation formed under the laws
of the Oneida Indian
Nation). She noted that the decision on
the liquor license applications for the golf courses and the club house was postponed
September 5th, 2007 by the state until October
3rd, 2007.
The case
involving the claim for 250,000 acres in New
York was heard before
Judge Kahn in Albany
this spring. In his ruling
Judge Hurd has dismissed the counties of Madison
and Oneida from the case and
ruled that the Indians may pursue a
monetary settlement from the state or perhaps the federal government. But the Oneidas are not entitled to any land within the settlement in oneida or Madison Counties. The
Indians have indicated that they will appeal this decision.
Following the Sherrill decision from the U.S. Supreme Court, Madison and Oneida counties have sued
seeking foreclosure on the property located in Oneida
and Madison Counties
for nonpayment of taxes. Federal Judge
Hurd whom Judy
noted was the original judge overturned in Sherrill, concurred
that foreclosure for nonpayment of taxes valid,
but ruled that there is no remedy that allows
repossession of the land. Judge Hurd
stated in his courtroom
that "he does not agree
with the Supreme Court of the United
States, and it isnot his boss
-- the second Circuit Court is. He stated that he does not have to adhere to the ruling of the United States Supreme
Court.
The
cases of Oneida and Madison Counties
have been joined and an appeal filed with The Second Circuit, and
we are waiting for a court date in
New York City. Central New York Fair Business Association, INC (CNYFBA) and Citizens
Equal Rights Alliance (CERA) have filed under the Administrative Proceedures Act (APA) and National Environmental
Protection Act (NEPA) for a
(Programmatic EIS) to be done on
all areas of NY for which the
Federal Government is considering the "taking" of land from
State Sovereignty (individually and in any combination thereof) and
placing it under
Federal Sovereignty (Fee to Trust process).
The
Department of Interior (DOI) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) turned
the argument over to the Department of Justice, which filed a
motion to
dismiss. We feel that even though Judge
Hurd granted the DOJ motion to
dismiss we were able to obtain some very important information
in the admissions of the DOJ. We have
filed a motion to appeal to
the second circuit and feel that we have
a strong case and a
good chance to win once we get beyond Judge Hurd.
We are not
challenging The Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) itself but the application of regulations prepared by a
bureaucratic agency. The IRA applies to Federal Public domain land. Because New York joined the union as one of the thirteen original colonies with its
borders intact, there is not and never has been federal land in New York State.
|